LowkeytheBaer
New Member
The Math of Ethics
Pleasure stolen = p
Free will inhibited = i
Suffering induced = s
Pleasure contributed = d
Free will enhanced = f
Suffering absolved = z
Culpability = c
Culpability calculates to the % of what occurs one takes the credit for. Personal responsibility. Culpability for inhibiting free will means losing an equivalent amount of control, enhancing the potency of freedom means reward in strengthening one's own autonomy. If one has done both, the smaller figure is subtracted from the larger figure.
I consider the simplest way to define Culpability Personal free will in interaction with the emotional and / or sensory experience of others.
And and / or subtract p i s from d f z = reward and / or consequence deserved according to eye for an eye scales.
As an example of how the imaginary number representation of intuited quantities can be reduced to real numbers, say it is possible to telepathically or (hopefully) indirectly monitor exact quantity of suffering endured by various individuals, one of whom is just bored and one of whom is severely tortured. Take the smallest isolatable quantity of suffering to be a single unit. The mildest form of measurable boredom, s = 1. Severe tortured divided by 1 = quantity, such as s = 1,789,023,789,074,189,902,146.
These mathematical scales are designed to apply to eye for an eye justice if applied without discriminating.
Ethical conduct, then, is defined by what (most emphatically) in the long term contributes to alleviating suffering, enhancing pleasure and free will.
Probability of truth or untruth Calculates (by my scales, until I witness to better measures) to degree of abstraction between one's self and a total retention of all relevant variables, meaning components of the answer to the question. V1, V2, V3, V4 ... The abstraction is the opportunity to project A False (if baited by pride) or series of false guesses.
Pleasure stolen = p
Free will inhibited = i
Suffering induced = s
Pleasure contributed = d
Free will enhanced = f
Suffering absolved = z
Culpability = c
Culpability calculates to the % of what occurs one takes the credit for. Personal responsibility. Culpability for inhibiting free will means losing an equivalent amount of control, enhancing the potency of freedom means reward in strengthening one's own autonomy. If one has done both, the smaller figure is subtracted from the larger figure.
I consider the simplest way to define Culpability Personal free will in interaction with the emotional and / or sensory experience of others.
And and / or subtract p i s from d f z = reward and / or consequence deserved according to eye for an eye scales.
As an example of how the imaginary number representation of intuited quantities can be reduced to real numbers, say it is possible to telepathically or (hopefully) indirectly monitor exact quantity of suffering endured by various individuals, one of whom is just bored and one of whom is severely tortured. Take the smallest isolatable quantity of suffering to be a single unit. The mildest form of measurable boredom, s = 1. Severe tortured divided by 1 = quantity, such as s = 1,789,023,789,074,189,902,146.
These mathematical scales are designed to apply to eye for an eye justice if applied without discriminating.
Ethical conduct, then, is defined by what (most emphatically) in the long term contributes to alleviating suffering, enhancing pleasure and free will.
Probability of truth or untruth Calculates (by my scales, until I witness to better measures) to degree of abstraction between one's self and a total retention of all relevant variables, meaning components of the answer to the question. V1, V2, V3, V4 ... The abstraction is the opportunity to project A False (if baited by pride) or series of false guesses.